ubc Welche Kompetenz hat Wissenschaftsphilosophie? 2012-10-24 [Electronic ed.] prv Universitätsbibliothek Chemnitz Universitätsbibliothek Chemnitz, Chemnitz Philosophische Fakultät male Many prominent scientists have pointed out that philosophy is of no benefit to science. Stephen Hawking asserts: Philosophy is dead! Sciences use conceptions like natural laws, matter, nature, theories, etc. But science is also confronted with questions such as: "What is a natural law?" "What is nature?" "What is matter?" and "What is a scientific theory?" These (metatheoretical) questions exceed the sphere of competence of science – they are items of the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science is a metatheory of science. The Philosophy of science overlaps epistemology, ontology, and metaphysics by exploring whether scientific results are true, or whether entities like quarks or electrons really exist. More detailed investigations bring various questions into consideration such as: "How do we define the boundaries between different scientific disciplines?" "Is there a relation between the beauty and the truth of a scientific theory?" and "How do we distinguish between science and pseudoscience?" Additionally, the philosophy of science is concerned with ethical problems of modern technology, with the methodological questions, with the reconstruction of the structure and the development of scientific theories, and with revealing of any indoctrination of science. The optimistic conclusion of this paper is: Philosophy is still alive – but the philosopher has to participate in round-table discussions with scientists. We just want philosophers talking to scientists! 100 Wissenschaftsphilosophie, Erkenntnistheorie, Ontologie, Metaphysik, Kompetenz Metatheorie der Wissenschaft, Metatheoretisch, Wissenschaftliche Theorien philosophy of science, metatheory of science, metatheoretical, epistemology, ontology, metaphysics, scientific theories, competence I. Über die Kompetenz und Inkompetenz von Philosophie 09 II. Philosophie und Wissenschaft 12 III. Philosophische Rückverweise in den Naturwissenschaften 15 IV. Kompass wissenschaftsphilosophischer Kompetenz 26 01. Ontologische Kompetenz 28 02. Epistemologische Kompetenz 28 03. (Meta-)Methodenkompetenz 29 04. Kompetenz der logisch-begrifflichen Analysen 30 05. Metaphysische Kompetenz 30 06. Begründungskompetenz 31 07. Kompetenz der philosophisch motivierten Antizipation 33 08. Rekonstruktionskompetenz (historisch und systematisch) 34 09. Die Abgrenzungskompetenz 38 10. Grenzziehungskompetenz 38 11. Antinomien- und Krisenmanagement-Kompetenz 39 12. Kooperationskompetenz 42 13. Ethische Kompetenz 42 14. Deideologisierungskompetenz 45 15. Ästhetische Kompetenz 46 16. Inkompetenzdestruktionskompetenz 51 Ausblick 53 Abkürzungen 55 Literatur 55 urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-qucosa-97576 978-3-941003-59-0 Technische Universität Chemnitz pbl Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz Universitätsverlag der Technischen Universität Chemnitz pbl Universitätsverlag der Technischen Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz Kay Herrmann Privatdozent Dr. phil. Dipl.-Phys. aut ger 2012 urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-qucosa-86009 qucosa:19698Welche Kompetenz hat Wissenschaftsphilosophie? born digital What is the Competence of Philosophy of Science? blum ute.blumtritt@bibliothek.tu-chemnitz.de lecture